In March of 2017 my wife Liz and I went Aurora Borealis (Northern Lights) hunting in Iceland. It’s a popular destination for chasing the Northern Lights hunting, but the results are often mixed. We were in Iceland for 8 days but only saw the lights twice, and only one of those was particularly memorable. Iceland can be cloudy for a week, and unless it’s a clear night, you just will not see them.
We caught a fabulous display on our second to last day in Iceland. We stayed at the Budir Hótel which I highly recommend. The Hotel is just two hours drive from Reykjavik. It’s situated on a lava field next to the ocean and there are plenty of sightseeing activities in the area.
The Malarrif Lighthouse is in Snæfellsjökull National Park, located just a short walk from the National Park’s visitor center.
Feature Image Details
For these images, I used a Canon 16-35MM F4 L Lens: If I had to pick one lens and one lens only, this lens would be at the top of the list.
These shots were all taken at 16mm for 13 seconds at ISO 2500.
It might not look like it but I underexposed the Northern Lights images. It is very easy to do at night. The display viewfinder looks good, but it isn’t. Trust the histogram, now what your eyes see.
I could have used at least one more stop of light on these shots. Instead of 13 seconds, I should have done 20 seconds.
Underexposed images looked really blotchy but I used Topaz Labs Denoise to smooth out the colors. The tradeoff was a loss of sharpness.
For these kinds of images, one needs to adjust the shadows and highlights negative. Otherwise, you will lose stars.
The longest exposure you can take without stars trailing (looking like streaks instead of pinpoints is governed by this equation.
- ET = 400/FL
- ET = seconds
- 400 is a constant by observation
- FL is the focal length used in mm
In this case, I was at 16 mm so I could have gone about 25 seconds. That would have really brought out the shadow details much better. Also, I could have bumped the ISO a bit, to say 3200. A combination of 20-25 seconds at ISO 3200 would have been about right.
Obviously, you need a tripod for this.
Long exposures at night are typically not extremely sharp (think wind, moving lights, very dark shadows, etc). Northern Lights are also moving. If they are moving fast, and the exposure is too long you will get a blurry mess. Thus, there was merit in attempting to keep the exposure time down.
A faster lens can help, but that is at the cost of depth of field. Everything is a tradeoff.
Those interested in my equipment and recommendations can find it here: Mish’s Equipment List.
Iceland Aurora Images
- Please see Iceland Northern Lights, Snæfellsnes Peninsula, Búðir for shots taken right on the hotel property.
- Also see Iceland Northern Lights, Snæfellsnes Peninsula, Búdir, Búdakirkja Church
Iceland is a fabulous destination. I have an entire series called Iceland in 16 days.
Scroll through my Mish Moments Home Page until you find them. I discuss where to go, where to stay, and what to see. I also have photo tips on many of the best locations.,
Interested in visiting Iceland?
Please see my Iceland Guide. It lists our complete itinerary for a 16-day summer solstice trip.
Please Subscribe: Click to Subscribe by Email.
If you like this article, please share by email or use one of the share buttons beneath the article.
You can also follow me on Twitter! I have both an economic forum and a photography forum.
- Photography: MishMoments
- Economics: MishGEA
MishMoments is a subset of MishGEA. Those interested in photography only should follow MishMoments.
Please follow. I do not give away or share email addresses!
Mike “Mish” Shedlock
2 thoughts on “Iceland Northern Lights, Snæfellsjökull National Park, Malarrif Lighthouse”
I really like the top photo of the concrete tower. Your explanation of night rules for photography was very informative.